Steppingstones, ..Part 1

They have our money, ..if they get our guns, ..America, ..(at least the America that I know,) DEAD.


Although I lack the formal education of the men and women that we, “we the people,” elect to (serve) terms of service to we, “we the people,” ..I fully understand ..(the concept of something for nothing).

For example; “I would like everyone reading my blog today to send me $100 with the promise and understanding that I will send your $100 back to you as a loan for which you will pay me an interest rate of 3%.

Question: Don’t be shy, ..speak up, ..I would truly like to know how many of you think this would be a good idea?

Well folks, (take a deep breath) because that’s the Federal Reserve act of 1913 in a nutshell. Which of course, (at least in my humble opinion,) one doesn’t have to live in a nutshell to understand that paying someone to use your own money is nuts!

And I also fully understand the definition of “subversion” and “treason.”

In 2006, the UN passed a resolution, “Towards an Arms Trade Treaty,” with a stated objective of establishing “common international standards for the import, export and transfer of conventional arms.” The rationale was that terrorism and gang violence could be thwarted by establishing international standards regulating small-arms proliferation.

(Sidebar) For those of you how may not know it? America is the only Nation remaining on the planet where an individual has (The Right  to Keep and Bear Arms ) guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the ‘our” Constitution.  The “Second Amendment,” the “First Amendment,” ( Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press) an inalienable right.


The Bush administration did not support the 2006 resolution, maintaining that each nation is best in a position to monitor and regulate arms sales rather than a one-size-fits-all approach assumed by the UN.

But in 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton indicated that the U.S. was no longer opposed to such an arms treaty, and in 2010, President Obama reversed the Bush administration objection to the earlier version.


Hillary Rodham Clinton

Question: At what point in history was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton anointed with the authority to decide the fate of America’s “Right to Keep and Bear Arms,” ..and/or ..the Second Amendment to “our” Constitution?

(Sidebar) For anyone who may be confused? Neither Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama have the authority to dismantle the U.S. Constitution.


Timing of this incarnation of a small arms treaty has been accelerated by the UN in hopes it can be signed by our current president and ratified by the Senate before the November election, which could significantly alter the outlook for U.S. participation.

The UNODA has published a document titled “Disarmament: A Basic Guide”, which lays out for the public the concerns regarding small arms.

On page 68, we read: “Counting such weapons is difficult, as the majority are owned by civilians. The trade in small arms is not well regulated and is the least transparent of all weapons systems.

Due to the lack of regulation and controls, in many countries it is too easy for small arms to slip from the legal into the illicit market, — through theft, ..leakage, ..corruption ..or pilferage.”

On the next page, we read: “Ammunition should be a key part of any discussion on small arms control.”

The UN clearly intends to address legal gun ownership within member states along with the trade of small arms.

One of their many research and statement pieces on the UNODA website states unequivocally that arms have been

“…misused by lawful owners and recommends that arms trade therefore be regulated in ways that would,

…minimize the misuse of legally owned weapons.” 

According to Webster: min·i·mize, To reduce to the smallest possible amount, extent, size, or degree.


Former UN ambassador John Bolton has affirmed this intent and indicates that the UN “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

While it’s uncertain what exact terms and provisions will be included in the new Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), the archive of documents on the UN Office of Disarmament Affairs website provide ample indications. From their own documents, it’s clear that they want to accomplish the following, as published by Forbes Online last week:

1. Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.

2. Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms.

3. Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons.

4. Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.

5. Control distribution and availability of ammunition for small arms.

The outcome, if adopted by the UN General Assembly and ratified by the U.S., would result in..

“overriding our national sovereignty,”

..and in the process, ..provide license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights,” according to Forbes.

Not only has the White House indicated support for the ATT; Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has vowed to push it through the Senate for ratification.

Until now, the administration’s attempts to diminish 2nd Amendment rights to bear arms have been under the radar, except when botched, as in the Fast and Furious gun walking incident which can only be logically explained away as an effort to create a crisis that they would capitalize on to this end.

We’ve seen all too many times how the Obama administration bypasses Congress and implements its agenda through executive orders.

Don’t be surprised if the White House attempts to circumvent the Senate’s ratification of the treaty altogether and declares the ATT “in effect” by Executive Order.

After all, constitutional limitations on government, and our constitutional rights, are only valid if honored and upheld, something this administration fails at when it conflicts with their agenda. (Source,

Barack Obama’s Marxist socialist agenda does not include the Second Amendment, ..and for that matter, does not include the First Amendment either.

Allow Barack Obama a second four years and you will see this…


Become this..


And this..


Become this..


 And this..


Become this..


 Think about it, I’ll be back tomorrow

Crusader Rabbit…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: