Taste or Brainwashing..

According to Webster: taste (in context) the ability to distinguish between sweet and bitter.

Sweet, Pleasing; agreeable.



Bit·ter, Sharply unpleasant; harsh.



According to Webster: brain·wash·ing, Intensive, forcible indoctrination, usually political, aimed at destroying a person’s basic convictions and attitudes and replacing them with an alternative set of fixed beliefs.

Question: Why do more people buy Capt Crunch…

 …than Wheaties?


..when everyone knows that Wheaties are better for you, and for your kids.

Simple: Capt. Crunch buys more advertising.

Come on America, get up off your elbows and spend your vote on a family sized box of Newt “Wheaties” Gingrich and leave Mitt “Capt Crunch” Romney on the shelf where his proven liberal ideology on Government run healthcare can’t destroy your children’s financial future.

Think about it, I’ll be back tomorrow

Crusader Rabbit…

Choosin’ Sides..

Deferring from Webster to my unabashed and unpublished  “pearlsofprofundity” dictionary: (choosin’ sides,) is defined as getting’ up off your elbows and taking a stand for “right,” over both “wrong and left.”



Yesterday, I touched on a few of the current anti-Gingrich sources being covered by the leaning left mainstream, i.e. “liberal media,” to include the all-time favorite motor mouth Ann Coulter, the distinguished columnist George Will, the also distinguished columnist and author Peggy Noonan and the not so distinguished convicted felon Tom delay.

Today I add “Charles Krauthammer” to the list…

Ann Coulter – taking aim at Newt.

Question: Do you think that one of Ann’s friends, if she has any? Should mention to her that “Conservative Americans” don’t shoot at “Conservative Americans.”


George Will – Renowned Columnist and Sniper.

Peggy Noonan – Friend or Foe?

Tom Delay – Credible Pundit, …NOT!

Charles Krauthammer, MD – born March 13, 1950, is an American Pulitzer Prize–winning syndicated columnist, political commentator, and physician. His weekly column appears in The Washington Post and is syndicated to more than 275 newspapers and media outlets. He is a contributing editor to the Weekly Standard and The New Republic. He is also a weekly panelist on the PBS news program Inside Washington and a nightly panelist on Fox News’s Special Report with Bret Baier.

Charles Krauthammer was born in New York City and raised in Montreal, Quebec, where he attended McGill Universityand obtained an honors degree in political science and economics in 1970.

McGill University is a public research university located in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The university bears the name of James McGill, a prominent Montreal merchant from Glasgow, Scotland, whose bequest formed the beginning of the university. Founded in 1821, McGill was chartered during the British colonial era, 46 years before the Canadian Confederation, making it one of the oldest universities in Canada. ( Source Wikipedia)

Krauthammer was also a Commonwealth Scholar in politics at Balliol College, Oxford, England 1970 – 1971. ( Source Wikipedia )

Balliol College, founded in 1263, is one of the constituent colleges of the University of Oxford in England. ( Source Wikipedia )

Krauthammer later moved back to the United States, where he attended Harvard Medical School. He graduated with his class, earning a Doctor of Medicine from Harvard Medical School in 1975, and went on to complete a residency in psychiatry at Massachusetts General Hospital. In 1984 he became board certified in Psychiatry by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. (Source Wikipedia)

Impressive credentials to be sure, albeit “is” Charles Krauthammer actually a conservative?


Within the American political spectrum, Krauthammer has been called a conservative. However, on domestic issues, Krauthammer is a supporter of legalized abortion; an opponent of the death penalty; an intelligent design critic and an advocate for the scientific consensus on evolution, calling the religion-science controversy a “false conflict;” Charles is also a supporter of embryonic stem cell research using embryos discarded by fertility clinics with restrictions in its applications; and a longtime advocate of radically higher energy taxes to induce conservation. Meg Greenfield, editorial page editor for The Washington Post who edited Krauthammer’s columns for 15 years, called his weekly column “independent and hard to peg politically. It’s a very tough column. There’s no ‘trendy’ in it. You never know what is going to happen next.”

(Sidebar) Question: Isn’t that pretty much what Krauthammer accused Newt Gingrich of, ..being “unpredictable.”

Hendrik Hertzberg, a former colleague of Krauthammer’s at The New Republic during the 1980s, said that when the two first met in 1978, Krauthammer was “70 per cent Mondale liberal, 30 per cent ‘Scoop Jackson Democrat,’ that is, hard-line on Israel and relations with the Soviet Union;” while in the mid-1980s, he was still “50-50: fairly liberal on economic and social questions but a full-bore foreign-policy “neoconservative.” Hertzberg now calls Krauthammer a “pretty solid 90-10 Republican.”

Krauthammer’s major monograph on foreign policy, “Democratic Realism: An American Foreign Policy for a “Unipolar World,”…

(Sidebar) According to Webster: u·ni·po·lar, Having, acting by means of, or produced by a single magnetic or electric pole.

…is critical both of the neoconservative Bush doctrine for being too expansive and utopian, and of foreign policy “realism” for being too narrow and immoral; instead, he proposes an alternative he calls “Democratic Realism.” In a 2005 speech (later published in Commentary Magazine) he called neoconservatism “a governing ideology whose time has come.” He noted that the original “fathers of neoconservatism” were “former liberals or leftists”. More recently, they have been joined by “realists, newly mugged by reality,” such as Condoleezza Rice, Richard Cheney, and George W. Bush, who “have given weight to neoconservatism, making it more diverse and, given the newcomers’ past experience, more mature.” In “Charlie Gibson’s Gaffe” in The Washington Post, September 13, 2008, Krauthammer elaborated on the changing meanings of the Bush Doctrine in light of Gibson’s controversial questioning of Republican Vice-Presidential candidate Sarah Palin regarding what exactly the Bush Doctrine was, as if there was a single definition. Palin was criticized for her response. Krauthammer states in the article that “The Bush Doctrine” has had “four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of” the Bush Administration. Krauthammer states that the phrase “Bush Doctrine” originally referred to “the unilateralism…

(Sidebar) According to Webster: u·ni·lat·er·al·ism, A tendency of Nations to conduct their foreign affairs individualistically, characterized by minimal consultation and involvement with other nations, even their allies.

…that characterized the pre-9/11 first year of the Bush administration.” He states that “There is no single meaning of the Bush Doctrine. He also states “the fourth and current definition of the Bush doctrine, the most sweeping formulation of the Bush approach to foreign policy and the one that most clearly and distinctively defines the Bush years: the idea that the fundamental mission of American foreign policy is to spread democracy throughout the world.”

FYI Charlie, “neo-conservatism” is simply an expediently coined replacement for the term; “Carpetbagger.”

Is Charles Krauthammer? A Conservative, neoconservative, traditionalist or fundamentalist, ..”In my considered opinion,” not so much.

I think I’ll stick with my “Tea Party” folks, like Sarah Palin, Herman Cain, and the good Reverend Donald E Wildmon and others who understand the definition of true conservatism.


Herman Cain endorsing Newt Gingrich

Newt Gingrich is a true conservative…

Think about it, I’ll be back tomorrow

Crusader Rabbit…

When Money rewrites History..

When money rewrites history, America gets a George W. Bush and a Barack Hussein Obama.

Let’s examine my statement…

George “Duba” Bush, a man, “who in my opinion” would lose and intellectual competition to “a box of rocks,” was elected to the Office of “President of the United States,” when money and influence rewrote history.

Barack Hussein Obama, a man “who in my opinion,” would be defeated in a clean hands competition with “a cockroach,” was elected to the Office of “President of the United States” when money and influence ignored history.

And it’s happening again…

Willard Mitt Romney, Massachusetts’s wealthy ego driven ex-governor is presently attempting to elevate himself with the good folks in Florida by blatantly and dishonestly altering the history of a man he couldn’t compete with otherwise.


Alluding to former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin in her interview with John Stossel, Sarah says; Newt Gingrich is being “crucified” by the Republican establishment, including allies of Mitt Romney, who are trying to rewrite his record with a barrage of negative attacks.

“Look at Newt Gingrich, what’s going on with him via the establishment’s attacks,” Palin told John Stossel of Fox Business on Thursday.

She added: “They’re trying to crucify this man and rewrite history and rewrite what it is that he has stood for all these years.”

Palin has not endorsed any of the GOP Presidential candidates, but has been enthusiastically supportive of Gingrich.

Last week before the South Carolina GOP primary Palin said she would vote for Newt Gingrich if she was voting in that state’s primary.

Palin’s husband, Todd, has officially endorsed Gingrich for president.

Sarah Palin explained her husband’s endorsement of Gingrich: “I think that endorsement was real reflective of a lot of Americans who understand that somebody with experience in cutting government budgets, cutting taxes, which does more for liberty and an economic turnaround than anything else, someone who has waged war on Hillarycare and government taking over of healthcare, somebody with that experience plus somebody who has struggled personally and overcome struggles and challenges, would be one that was embraced by voters.”

And Sarah Palin’s defense of Gingrich, especially of his conservative, Reaganite record, has gotten significant backing from leading conservatives.

On Thursday, Rush Limbaugh slammed Romney allies for a “coordinated attack” on Gingrich.

Limbaugh described Gingrich as the “premier defender of Ronald Reagan” and said such smear tactics against Gingrich hurt Mitt Romney.

“That kind of stuff is why people hate Romney so much,” Limbaugh said.

Palin also struck out at conservative writers like Washington Post columnist George Will and Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan, who earlier this month called Gingrich an “angry little attack muffin.”

“That’s that typical hypocrisy stuff in the media, you know, I’ve lived with over a couple of decades in the political arena,” she told Stossel, complaining that Mitt Romney doesn’t get the same treatment.

Last week, in a radio interview with Sean Hannity, Palin blasted ABC News for its interview with Gingrich’s ex-wife, Marianne Gingrich, saying these kinds of media hits “incentivize conservatives and independents” who are tired of “the politics of personal destruction.”

“We know the game now, and we just won’t put up with it. Good call, media.”

Romney is suffering a major backlash from conservatives outraged by his tactics.

Michael Reagan, the conservative commentator and son of President Reagan, slammed Romney for his recent assault on Gingrich.

“As governor of Massachusetts, Romney’s achievement was the most socialistic healthcare plan in the nation up until that time,” Reagan said.
“Say what you want about Newt Gingrich but when he was speaker of the House he surrounded himself with Reagan conservatives and implemented a Ronald Reagan program of low taxes and restrained federal spending.

“Newt’s conservative program created a huge economic boom and balanced the budget for the first time in more than a generation.”
Mike Reagan concluded: “I would take Newt Gingrich’s record any day over Mitt Romney’s.” (Source, newsmax.com)

Editorial: Accordingly, “at least in my opinion,” folks like Ann Coulter, George Will and Peggy Noonan, purported conservatives should be totally ashamed of themselves.

Ann Hart Coulter, is an American lawyer, conservative social and political commentator, author, and syndicated columnist. She frequently appears on television, radio, and as a speaker at public events and private events. Well-known for her conservative political opinions and the controversial ways in which she presents and defends them, Coulter has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do.” ( Source Wikipedia )

George Frederick Will, is an American newspaper columnist, journalist, and author. He is a Pulitzer Prize-winner best known for his conservative commentary on politics. By the mid 1980s the Wall Street Journal reported he was “perhaps the most powerful journalist in America,” in a league with Walter Lippmann. (Source Wikipedia)

Peggy Noonan, is an American author of seven books on politics, religion, and culture and a weekly columnist for The Wall Street Journal. She was a primary speech writer and Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan and in her political writings is considered a Republican. In her political writings, Noonan frequently cites the political figures she admires, including Ronald Reagan, Abraham Lincoln, and Edmund Burke. (Source Wikipedia)

As for Newt Gingrich’s detractor Tom Delay…

Thomas Dale “Tom” DeLay, is a former member of the United States House of Representatives and “ convicted felon.” … (Source Wikipedia)

Need I say more? Other than, “at least in my opinion,” considering their present tact, ..Ann, ..George, ..Peggy and ..Tom might want to consider applying for employment with MSNBC or NPR.

Don’t be stupid, Mitt Romney is a documented socialist when it comes to healthcare, and he wants to run your life every bit as much as Barack Obama.

If my choice is between a documented liar and a man accused of bad judgment and impropriety, I’m going with the guy accused of impropriety.

According to Webster: im·pro·pri·e·ty, The quality or condition of being improper.

Think about it, I’ll be back tomorrow

Crusader Rabbit…

Evolution in America..

This according to Webster: ev·o·lu·tion, A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form.

From Wooden Ships…

Santa Maria

 To Space Ships…


America has evolved and it has been a gradual process. Gradual is good, gradual is stable and gradual serve the people more surely than abrupt.

According to Webster: a·brupt, 1. Unexpectedly sudden. 2. Surprisingly and unceremoniously; curt. 3. Touching on one subject after another with sudden transitions. 4. Steeply inclined. 5. Terminating suddenly rather than gradually.

Let’s take a moment and examine “abrupt” more closely.

Question: What does “abrupt” mean to you and how has “abrupt” affected your life in recent years?

Speaking for myself, I would present an example of “abrupt” as electing a no experience, non-vetted Junior Democratic Senator from the State of Illinois to the office of President of the United States,


I believe the decision to use American tax dollars to bailout corporate America was “abrupt.”

I believe that every rank-and-file man and woman in America who lost their job since 2008, understand the meaning of the word “abrupt.”

For those of you who haven’t been paying attention, since January 20, 2009, Barack Obama, has indeed touched on “one subject after another,” like closing Guantánamo Bay, healthcare, defendings America’s borders, creating shovel ready jobs, creating green energy, ..all (without success) resulting in a “suddenly transition” for millions of Americans from employed, ..to unemployed since “he” (Barrack Obama) set foot in the Oval Office. ..and for those of you with families, or hope to have families, Barack Obama is presently in the process of “terminated” your family’s future.

But enough about the dark side, there is a ray of sunshine on the horizon for those not blinded by rhetoric.

We, “We the People,” albeit interested or not? ..are being deluged by political ads to select an individual to replace Barack Obama. Which of course goes without saying, “is my agenda” between now and Tuesday, November 6.

My candidate, Newton Leroy “Newt” Gingrich, my reasons, Newt has “real” experience in Washington. Newt has “real” accomplishments in Washington. Newt is not intimidated by the press, nor is he intimidated by either side of the aisle. Newt is tough, Newt will serve “America’s interests” instead of America’s “special” interests.

A paradigm to ponder…

Close your eyes, ..now invoke your imagination, ..it’s after midnight, ..you are in an unlit alley, (where, and how you got there, doesn’t matter) you encounter John King, Wolf Blitzer, Rachel Maddow and Chris Matheson with questions about where you slept last night?

Who do you want at your side; Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, or Newt Gingrich?

 Newton Leroy Gingrich

Think about it, I’ll be back tomorrow

Crusader Rabbit…

Debate or Debacle..

According to Webster: de·ba·cle, (in context) 1. A disastrous collapse. 2. A ludicrous failure.

According to Webster: dis·as·trous, 1.a. A catastrophe. b. A grave misfortune. 2. Informal. A total failure.

According to Webster: lu·di·crous, Laughable or hilarious because of obvious absurdity or incongruity; foolish

Editorial: In all my years of observing political candidates vying for the office of President of the United States, I have never witnessed a more pathetic display of disgusting, vile, inappropriate childish behavior.

Although Newt Gingrich again brought to light that his purpose and the purpose of his fellow candidates was to convey the necessity of electing the GOP to save America from Barack Obama and socialism or worse, ..“Obamaism.” Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Ron Paul conjointly continued attacking Newt Gingrich on everything from toothpaste and toilet paper.


Behavior not only understood, but expected from liberal ilk like Wolf Blitzer. Newt Gingrich makes no secret of the fact that he disapproves of liberal media bias, ..what intelligent “common sense” human being doesn’t?

What Wolf Blitzer and his ilk fail to comprehend is that he was employed last evening to moderate a debate between four GOP candidates, not to incite or referee a schoolyard brawl. A “debate,” by my understanding and by Merriam-Webster’s definition…

According to Webster: de·bate, (in context) To engage in a discussing of opposing views.

..America, “at least in my considered opinion,” has for too long now given credence to a conglomeration of agenda driven left-wing bias individuals who in reality via self hypnosis are incapable of understanding anyone or anything outside of their liberal programming.

According to Webster: cre·dence, Acceptance as true or valid.

According to Webster: pro·gram·ming,  (in context) To train to perform automatically in a desired manner. 

According to Webster: mod·er·a·tor,  (in context) One who presides over a meeting, forum, or debate.

Whether due to a lack of understanding concerning the job description or responsibility of a moderator, or due to his liberal programming, Wolf Blitzer did not properly perform his duty as a moderator during last night’s GOP debate.

Nowhere in the description or definition of the word “moderator,” does the word “instigator appear.

According to Webster: in“sti·ga”tor, To urge on; goad. 2. To stir up; foment.

Accordingly, it is my considered opinion that if Wolf Blitzer or any other liberal ilk wants to referee fights, then they should apply through proper channels to the athletic commission of the state in which they reside to acquire a license.

Now then, to the business of selecting an individual to compete with Barack Obama for the Oval Office in 2012. The GOP had better get its head out of its armpit and back to the business of convincing me and other common sense driven Americans that our choices for a 2012 Presidential candidate are better than the childish, self-centered, trivial individuals that allowed Wolf Blitzer to manipulate them in front of CNN’s cameras and the world last evening.

If Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, or Ron Paul believeat that there ill behavior in attacking a fellow Republican, in name, Newton Leroy Gingrich, will not be used against the GOP in the general election, Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney and Ron Paul desperately need counsel.

When I was in Vietnam, as a matter of protocol to survive any particular 24-hour period, It was standard practice not only to crush our C-ration cans, it was protocol to bury them as well, ..so as not to provide “material” to our enemy that could be used to construct a device that could kill you the following day.

Newt Gingrich has warned sense day one that quarreling among the ranks of the GOP would do nothing more than advance the GOP’s opposition. Of course, with not being a college graduate,  ..I can only offer a layman’s, “common sense” opinion that if Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, and Ron Paul have nothing more than negative rhetoric to promote themselves, they all need to sit down and have a long session with themselves about what it means to be an American, ..and what “America” needs, ..not what “they want.”

And yes Gentleman, ..I totally understand that it is difficult to accept that there is a “better man” to serve America than you, ..but you’ll get over it.

Newton Leroy Gingrich – The better man.

 Think about it, I’ll be back tomorrow

Crusader Rabbit…

With great power..



Newton Leroy Gingrich

 Think about it, I’ll be back tomorrow

Crusader Rabbit…


Hard Drive crashed..!!!!!

Sorry, ..be back tomorrow, ..I HOPE !  🙂

UN-Civil WAR..

According to Webster: un·civ·il, 1. Discourteous; rude.

According to Webster: war,  (in context) A condition of active antagonism or contention: a war of words.

Alluding to history; Prior to, ..and during the initial GOP debates in September and October, all of the participating candidates were adamant in agreement that “they,” were running against Barack Obama. However, now that the field of candidates is whittled down to four, with Newt Gingrich, who carried the banner for “unity and civility” is sitting in the catbird’s seat instead of Mitt Romney, it would seem that Mitt Romney is no longer concerned with “unity or civility” in the GOP. With his decisive loss to Newt Gingrich in South Carolina, Mitt Romney has digressed to angry adolescents, in continuing his inappropriate juvenile aggression against Newt Gingrich, who, “at least in my humble opinion,” stood firm last night and maintained his dignity and his course on the high road by speaking to the issues that concern “our,” “we the people” presently under (the Obama administration) struggling Nation, i.e., “America,” instead of speaking to the issues that concern himself.

America does “not” need a President that behaves like a six-year-old whose dog won’t fetch.

I do not dislike Mitt Romney, albeit with that said, be assured that when my grandchildren are disrespectful and rude, they do not get dessert.

When Mitt Romney replied to Brian Williams’s question, ..as to whether or not, ..he, ..Mitt Romney, “believed that America was still a great Nation?” ..and he, ..Mitt Romney, ..replied; “We are a great nation, ..but, ..a great Nation doesn’t have people that are suffering.”

According to Webster: con·tra·dic·tion, – Inconsistency.

As a child, I was as “guilty” of wanting things, “both ways,” as any child on the planet. However, ..as life, “or at least my life,” ..has “not” been a “Cornucopia,” (horn of plenty,) I eventually grew up to understand that an individual, “a responsible individual,” who has “wants and needs,” ..best, ..and most “expediently,” satisfies “his or her” needs, ..by working for them.

Mitt Romney does indeed have an admirable resume in the private sector, he has earned an enviable amount of money. With that said, “at least in my opinion,” the U.S. Government is “not” about earning money. The United States Government is about managing money, ..my money, ..and your money. Tax dollars derived from “us” ..the rank-and-file, “We the People,” who presently, “once again,” have the “opportunity” to elect an individual come November, to “manage” our money. As, “We the People,” (as a nation,) ..failed miserably in 2008.

Editorial: At seventy years of age, and a lifelong “dedicated conservative” American with a vested interest in this Nation, consisting of both family and property. I feel fully confident, obligated and qualified to share my opinions, or I would “not” spend so much of my time, ..which at “seventy,” is worth well beyond what I valued time when I was 25. So pay attention, ..the GOP, ..albeit seemingly at war with itself last night, ..is without question, ..America’s (FDL) “final defensive line,” against total and irrevocable “Obamaism.”

Think about it, I’ll be back tomorrow

Crusader Rabbit…

Happy Birthday Michelle..

                       Michelle Obama – 48

Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama (born January 17, 1964) is the wife of the 44th and incumbent President of the United States, Barack Obama, and is the first African-American First Lady of the United States. Raised on the South Side of Chicago, Obama attended Princeton University and Harvard Law School before returning to Chicago and to work at the law firm Sidley Austin, where she met her future husband. Subsequently, she worked as part of the staff of Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley, and for the University of Chicago Medical Center.

Throughout 2007 and 2008, she helped campaign for her husband’s presidential bid and delivered a keynote address at the 2008 Democratic National Convention. She is the mother of two daughters, Malia and Sasha, and is the sister of Craig Robinson, men’s basketball coach at Oregon State University. As the wife of a Senator, and later the First Lady, she has become a fashion icon and role model for women, and an advocate for poverty awareness, nutrition and healthy eating. (Source Wikipedia)

According to Webster: ad·vo·cate, To speak, plead, or argue in favor of.

According to Webster: pov·er·ty, The state of being poor. 

Michelle Obama – Advocate for the poor

 According to Webster: poor, Having little or no wealth and few or no possessions.

These people are aware that they are poor.

According to Webster: a·ware“ness, Having knowledge or cognizance.

In the news:

The Obamas Feast on $81 Steaks…

President Barack Obama and wife Michelle celebrated the first lady’s 48th birthday Tuesday night by dining at a Washington, D.C., restaurant featuring a hamburger named “The Obama.” But they passed on the burger and instead both enjoyed a 10-ounce American Wagyu steak with an $81 price tag.  

“The Obama” is one of five burgers on BLT Steak’s “Political Burger Board.” It’s an 8-ounce American Kobe burger with bacon, cheddar cheese, burnt tomato ketchup, and scallion mustard. American Kobe beef is from a line of Japanese Wagyu cattle prized for its fat marbling. The burger sells for $28.

The “Bi Partisan” burger, $32, is an 8-ounce burger with Maine lobster, white cheddar cheese, and black truffle buttermilk dressing.

Other burgers include the “Pork Barrel,” “Cuban Missile,” and “BLT Monument.”

The Obamas enjoyed their meal in a private dining room and the restaurant’s assistant general manager reported to the Foodorama blog that Michelle Obama “dines with us quite regularly.”

Other items on the menu include a dozen oysters for $34, a bone-in rib eye steak ($47), sautéed Dover sole ($49), ..with french fries on the side for $8.

The establishment also offers a bottle of Chateau Petrus 1984 Pomerol, at $1,200. ..albeit there is no evidence that the Obama’s imbibed. (Source, newsmax.com)

Summary: “At least in my opinion,” according to Wikipedia’s bio on Michelle, while she enjoys being a “role model” and “icon” for “women and fashion,” her real sympathies lie with her subordinates, i.e., “those less fortunate,” which of course compels her to make them, “us” and the world mindful of what “they” and “we” ..”We the People” under her husband’s administration don’t have.

Barack Obama, President of the United States…

…eating healthy !



To my readers…

Think about it, I’ll be back tomorrow

Crusader Rabbit…


According to Webster: sum·ma·ry, Presenting the substance in a condensed form; concise.


Newton Leroy Gingrich – Concise and Clear.

According to Webster: con·cise, Expressing much in few words; clear and succinct.


Mitt Romney – Bewildered

According to Webster: be·wil·dered, Confuse or befuddled, especially with numerous conflicting situations, objects, or statements.


Rick Santorum – Sour Grapes

According to Webster: sour grapes, Denial of the desirability of something after one has found out that it cannot be reached or acquired.


Ron Paul – Joyful

According to Webster: joy·ful, Feeling, causing, or indicating joy.

Editorial: “Kudos to Ron Paul, after the negativity from Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, it was refreshing to witness Ron’s elation and enthusiasm. To analogize; “Ron was like a kid with two candy bars.” ..and although we all know that two candy bars won’t feed the Nation, ..he didn’t go negative on Newt, ..he was pleased with his portion.”


Ann Coulter – Motor Mouth

Editorial: Appearing on “Fox and Friends” this morning, “Ann Coulter,” Well-known for her conservative political opinions and the controversial ways in which she presents and defends herself and her opinions, was adamant and baring her teeth this morning when she chastised the population of South Carolina for choosing Newt Gingrich over Mitt Romney. Coulter has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as some broadcasters do.” She charged mouth first into her interview explicating in her usual whiny tone that if America didn’t get in line and pick up on seeing the world as she does, this Nation, i.e., “America” will be lost forever.”

Maybe Ann should read books, ..instead of write them?

Think about it, I’ll be back tomorrow

Crusader Rabbit…

Previous Older Entries